<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hive Health &#187; compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hivehealth.com/tag/compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hivehealth.com</link>
	<description>beapart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
		<link>http://hivehealth.com/2009/01/whats-in-a-name/</link>
		<comments>http://hivehealth.com/2009/01/whats-in-a-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hivehealth.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When researching issues relating to medication compliance, to ensure I capture all relevant studies, I find myself having to type the following into the relevant search engine: &#8220;compliance OR adherence OR concordance&#8220;. I find this incredibly frustrating, and not just because it takes me a long time. Supposedly, the evolution of the concept of compliance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When researching issues relating to medication compliance, to ensure I capture all relevant studies, I find myself having to type the following into the relevant search engine: &#8220;<strong>compliance</strong> OR <strong>adherence</strong> OR <strong>concordance</strong>&#8220;. I find this incredibly frustrating, and not just because it takes me a long time. Supposedly, the <em>evolution</em> of the concept of compliance to adherence to concordance is the semantic equivalent of kicking paternalistic healthcare provision squarely in the balls. But is it? Can a lexiconic adjustment really represent a tangible step forward in patient empowerment? Or, as I suspect, is it a ploy to suggest progress where there is little?</p>
<p>	Answers on the back of a postcard, please.</p>
<p>	So, why this entry now? I was reminded of my frustration at this issue by th<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-578" src="http://dev4.ringforth.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/istock_000006856793xsmall-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" />at I experienced in response to the government&#8217;s long-expected and recently-announced decision to reclassify cannabis as a Class B drug. A monumental U-turn, that flies in the face of expert advice. Could the time, effort, and money spent on tinkering with this (more-or-less) arbitrary classification not be put to more useful ends, like a public health campaign highlighting the dangers associated with cannabis use? Don&#8217;t bother with the postcards, the answer is: yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hivehealth.com/2009/01/whats-in-a-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

