Blog

The ‘Starbuckisation’ of community pharmacy

In 1993 George Ritzer described the concept of McDonaldisation. He suggested that the principals behind the world domination of McDonalds had relevance far beyond fast food and were enabling globalised fast living in all sorts of different ways.

In 2000 Harding and Taylor took this theory and proposed that the big high street/ supermarket chains represented the McDonaldisation of pharmacy. ‘Fast-pharmacy’ was built on traits of efficiency, calculability, predictability and control opposed to a service based offering in smaller chains or sole-owned pharmacies.

While these 4 traits remain readily identifiable within, in particular, supermarket pharmacies other large chains (such as Boots) appear to have moved on. In 2006 Ritzer elaborated on his theory to describe the process of Starbucksisation as a variant on the McDonaldisation model. In this incarnation the focus is on promoting a premium product and the customer experience while still benefitting from a streamlined business model. In Starbucks we are encouraged to ‘hang out’ and have meetings on comfortable sofa’s while drinking ‘premium’ coffee in porcelain mugs. In reality however the experience is highly rationalised. Coffee beans are bought in bulk, the vast majority of customers take-out and don’t participate in the ‘community’ offer and barista skill is replaced by standardised protocols. Ritzer argues that Starbucks represents a case of emperor’s new clothes. The apparently individualised and locally determined offer cannot disguise the mass marketing strategy and the critiques of McDonaldised society still apply.

For pharmacy this shift towards a Starbucks-like model is perhaps more significant than it might at first seem. In the drive to reposition pharmacy within the British healthcare system there are calls for pharmacies to become ‘healthy living centres’ at the ‘heart’ of local communities. While the McDonaldised offer finds it difficult to answer to these demands a ‘Starbucksised’ model that provides an ersatz ‘consistently local’ experience seems to be a perfect fit and it is these chains that are most keenly exploring this new direction for pharmacy.

Whether or not this move presents a problem depends perhaps on your perspective.

For pharmacy as a profession a number of concerns associated with a business model that remains strongly determined by centralised management include: decreased personal involvement and autonomy of the individual pharmacist resulting in de-skilling, the need to place shareholder interests over and above potential patient benefit and the fact that the ‘brand‘ sits as a higher level communicator with the consumer and defines the professionality or otherwise of the pharmacist on his/her behalf.

Added to this, with just nine McDonaldised and Starbucksised pharmacy groups now holding around 50% of all pharmacy contracts in the UK the influence of this model in determining the direction of future pharmacy policy cannot be ignored. How the Starbucks model shapes the ‘healthy living centre’ will, in particular, have an impact on the types of environment pharmaceutical products are sold/ dispensed within and the type of expertise and services that are offered alongside medicines.

Food for thought next time you grab a latte…

 


Otcs

Thursday saw us at another awards bash, this time the OTC Bulletin Awards. We were delighted to be nominated 6 times for 3 brands across 4 award categories, and chuffed to pick up 2 of them. But the night belonged to alli, one of our founding clients, and a brand that will always hold a special place as a result.  6 brand awards. Congratulations GSK and to the other award winners for the night.


Doing Wembley

Just back from a really inspiring evening held by a client for 250 pharmacists at Wembley Stadium.

Alongside chicken satay and chardonnay was a really fresh approach.

Half way between stand-up and business school the slide presentation avoided a focus on products, ingredients, features or benefits. And elevated the discussion to value and driving an understanding that customer satisfaction was the common ground that existed between the audience and organisers.

The two hour presentation waxed lyrical on the value placed by customers on the interaction and the urgent requirement for pharmacy to wake up to engaging their customers in the non product elements of the consultation.

Delivered in a fresh, unusual and pretty compelling way it’s the first time I have seen this challenging approach and style of presentation given live with customers on a mature brand.

It’s pretty common to train and educate on launch brands during a med ed’ phase, but this focused on Business ed’ and went down a storm.  It provided a real opportunity for the company to demonstrate commercial expertise, partnership . Probably most importantly  it elevated the discussion from product flogging to a genuine adult to adult dialogue. A business talking to another business for mutual gain, rather than supplier and stockist fulfilling the usual adult child  cliché.

I hope to be able to get some footage to show you.


A new (alli)ance?

 Almost a year ago I wrote an article on POM to P, a call for pharmacy to embrace the opportunity that new P brands offer. I stand by my argument that pharmacists’ role in consultation gives value to the consumer and allows pharmacy to become true healthcare providers of the high street.

A year on the opportunity arrives. We are proud to have been an intrinsic part of the launch of alli, a landmark pharmacy launch and arguably the most successful pharmacy switch ever. What is so important about alli is that the consultation is a critical part of the offer – more interaction than transaction. It’s a launch that emphasises pharmacy’s shift from a provider of products to an enabler of positive behavioural change. With alli, pharmacists must outline the personal commitment essential to weight loss, help consumers understand their responsibilities and manage their expectations.

To date both pharmacy and consumers have embraced this brand wholeheartedly. GSK have invested heavily in training and pharmacy have enrolled for that training at an unprecedented rate. It feels that this is the switch pharmacy are really going to get behind, proving once and for all that broader access to treatments is good for manufacturers, good for pharmacy, and most importantly good for us all.

Time will tell…