Taking the Medicine – Druin Burch
This book has nothing to do with adherence. This is a history book that charts the rise to evidence-based medicine in a light, provocative format.
The author is a former NHS doctor who scrutinizes how we have treated and trusted. He points out the one truth behind centuries of unscientific meddling: for better or worse, nothing in medicine is as difficult as doing nothing at all. Amongst the hard-learned lessons stitching these chapters together, people like to be helped and doctors like to help.
The problem, says Burch, is that this altruism has been through a mangle of self-delusion. Even those who truly believed in their cures ended up inflicting a lot of nastiness and suffering. Burch doesn’t reserve this contempt for pre-science cranks – in fact he regards most treatment prior to the mid 20th century as dangerous tinkering by candlelight.
Rhetoric by the spoonful kept western medicine going. Increasing urbanization meant failings went ever more public, so an eloquent get-out clause could save the day. It was generations of genius that produced what we know as good practice – starting with people like Francis Bacon facing up to their ability to be wrong. But while theory was coming on, practice meant practice – every treatment was an experiment on an actual living person.
Beyond tales of the big drug discoveries –insulin, aspirin, penicillin – we are reminded that drugs work in many ways. One way is to make you better (quinine), another is to make you imagine so (morphine). Before we get too abstract, let’s gaze into the terrifying cradle of the modern randomized trial – which is really what this book is about.
Far from the laboratory or bewigged Royal Society halls, it was the battlefield or POW camp where the boys (control arm) were separated from the men (active arm). Each time, a tiny percentage of mistakes was ironed out, and the method improved time over time. As you can imagine, ethics back then meant being extra nice to the prison guard in return for more gauze, or agonizing (as Cochrane did) over how to divide prisoners up into treatment and placebo arms. Sociologically, it’s interesting to see how ethics has evolved from a quickfire mental calculation into whole conundrums that demand the attention of all soceity. We engender more subtle kinds of warfare when we talk about designer babies and radical life extension.
While the author can be quite vehemently dismissive of altruism (far from being ignorant chancers, our deluded quacks have actually foisted “evils” on the world), and even more so of alternative and non-traditional medicines, he avoids preaching on the modern scientific method as a moral elixir. “Trials tell you certain truths about the world, but not others. They add to your ability to make decisions – not to your ability to make them” (p.304).
It is not smug progress but a sense of enfeebled ignorance that lingers. We’re back where we started with the desperate trust we place in those we think know more than us. Burch’s final warning is on this self-delusional blinding. So that, what we are pressed to solve is not immediately gene therapy and machine intelligence; what we are left muddling over is not which of our very own “evils” a future society will look back on in shame. We have a pretty good design for finding out what works empirically. We have a grand design where the more we don’t know, the more violently we defend our opinion. Where’s the medicine for that?

I took a solo trip to the Egyptian peninsula for scuba diving and sun. I had this in abundance, and I also had a glimpse of how they do healthcare over there. I was not conducting fieldwork, I was having fun. So here are some simple stories.
In the news today, NHS Scotland is being lobbied on the mass intake of newly qualified doctors into healthcare posts. This happens in August every year. Now the Royal College of Physicians (Edinburgh) links this practice to higher death rates and is proposing a more staggered approach of rotations.





